Comparative Statics When the Objective Function Is Concave: Old Wine in Old Bottles?

This is the publisher's version, also available electronically from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830228?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsSee article for abstract

The Theory of Spiritual Capital as Social Capital

This presentation was given on April 8, 2006 at the Business and Islam conference, held April 7-8, 2006 at the University of Kansas. The Business and Islam conference was sponsored by the University of Kansas (KU), the Kansas African Studies Center (KASC), the Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) and the KU Department of Economics.The Business and Islam conference was sponsored by the University of Kansas (KU), the Kansas African Studies Center (KASC) and the Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) and the KU Department of Economics

A Simple Proof of the Ramsey Savings Equation

This is the publisher's version, also available electronically from http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1020010.See article for abstract

An Economic Model of a Professional Sports League

This is the publisher's version, also available electronically from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1830103?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsSee article for abstract.This work was supported in part under grants from the National Science Foundation and the University of Kansas

On Comparative Dynamics

Lately, there has been an increased interest in stability of growth paths, see e.g., Brock and Scheinkman [1974]. The problem has been stated in terms of properties of stationary paths. In order to appreciate the difficulty of the general stability problem, one must realize that there are two types of "time" involved in the analysis: stability "time” and path “time.” Thus, the appropriate mathematical field is that of differential equations defined on a space of functions rather than a finite dimensional space. Naturally, if one restricts one’s attention to stationary paths, then the usual stability analysis is appropriate. However, we would be then discussing the asymptotic behavior of the asymptotic state of the economy. This note strives to put the problem of path stability in the proper perspective by discussing the much simpler problem of comparative dynamics. Unfortunately this term has been used in the economic growth literature to discuss the basically comparative statics problem of comparing stationary growth paths. By comparative dynamics, we mean the determination of the “direction” of change in the optimal path of decision variables due to a change in the exogenous variables. The traditional method of deriving comparative statics results has been to use second order conditions for optimality. However, if one is willing to assume concavity, these results could be derived in a more direct way by utilizing the fact that a differentiable concave function lies below its tangent plane. We shall use this concept in deriving the main inequalities of this note. By way of motivation, we first derive two inequalities of comparative statics. Then we derive the comparative dynamics results and finally we discuss some economic theoretical examples

On Comparative Dynamics

Lately, there has been an increased interest in stability of growth paths, see e.g., Brock and Scheinkman [1974]. The problem has been stated in terms of properties of stationary paths. In order to appreciate the difficulty of the general stability problem, one must realize that there are two types of "time" involved in the analysis: stability "time” and path “time.” Thus, the appropriate mathematical field is that of differential equations defined on a space of functions rather than a finite dimensional space. Naturally, if one restricts one’s attention to stationary paths, then the usual stability analysis is appropriate. However, we would be then discussing the asymptotic behavior of the asymptotic state of the economy. This note strives to put the problem of path stability in the proper perspective by discussing the much simpler problem of comparative dynamics. Unfortunately this term has been used in the economic growth literature to discuss the basically comparative statics problem of comparing stationary growth paths. By comparative dynamics, we mean the determination of the “direction” of change in the optimal path of decision variables due to a change in the exogenous variables. The traditional method of deriving comparative statics results has been to use second order conditions for optimality. However, if one is willing to assume concavity, these results could be derived in a more direct way by utilizing the fact that a differentiable concave function lies below its tangent plane. We shall use this concept in deriving the main inequalities of this note. By way of motivation, we first derive two inequalities of comparative statics. Then we derive the comparative dynamics results and finally we discuss some economic theoretical examples

Seminar Statement, and Program of February 2005 Companion Workshop at Al Azar University, Egypt

The Business and Islam conference was held April 7-8, 2006 at the University of Kansas. The Business and Islam conference was sponsored by the University of Kansas (KU), the Kansas African Studies Center (KASC), the Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) and the KU Department of Economics.The Business and Islam conference was sponsored by the University of Kansas (KU), the Kansas African Studies Center (KASC) and the Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) and the KU Department of Economics